FateAnalysis.com

March 30, 2009

Your choices are mirror of your unconscious.

flash card: revisionist psychology #001

How valid is Self-Analysis? If not practiced correctly and applied rigorously to all your neurotic trends it has no validity at all. You knew that already, Did you not?

Don’t try to remenber this. It will stick in your mind relative to what it means to you.

Photo form L. Szondi’s “Experimental Diagnostics of Drives” 1952 (c) Grune & Stratton, N.Y.

Taking the Szondi Test.

Subject’s choice, Like [h] photos:

[h+]= Vicissitudes of and strivings for, emotional softness, tenderness, feminine stance and body rapport desire seductive and a preference to keep it going and extract a token of emotional appreciation and support.

Subject’s choice, Dislike [h] photos:

[h-]= Vicissitudes of and strivings for, a self-sacrificing and distanced emotional stance, of the humanitarian, body rapport desire is cyclic, distanced or inconsistent.

Subject’s choice, Like [s] photos:

[s+]= Vicissitudes of and strivings for emotional hardness, masculine power stance, body rapport desire direct and preferably without obligation.

Subject’s choice, Dislike [s] photos:

[s-]= Vicissitudes of and strivings for, emotional passiveness, moral masochistic stance, body rapport indirect or homosexual.

This is the mirror logic for like and dislike of just two factors, when extended to all eight genic factors, you then are profiled as what you are in the mood of the moment. This is why samples need be taken daily or three times a week to reflect a person’s personality accurately.

Before you volunteer to take the genic test, to advance your self-analysis and/or have the reading discussed publicly on this Blog please read the disclaimer, about no claims of scientific value in any specific finding. You are to draw your own conclusions.

March 12, 2009

[dreameryv2] Answers a reader.

dreamerv2jpec

March 12, 2009

In a comment intended for me, [DREAMERYV2] from a reader who asks: HAVE YOU LOOKED INTO L. RON HUBBARD’S BOOK
“SELF ANALYSIS”? (This with the suggestion that this might be the right thing for me.)
THANK YOU READER, for your concern, as matter of fact I bought the hard cover $45.00 book and found it has a lot to recommend it. The writing style was smooth and I was introduced to the more complex concepts without going beyond my personal understanding level. I was surprised to discover that just like Dr. Phil McGraw, he introduces you to yourself via the use of personal inventories. The first of which a very large intimidating table, aimed at locating yourself in it. What was, as it seemed to me, to be on a life survival continuum. Certainly this is a unique way of getting a handle on where you are in life. The next several inventories works by questioning yourself from a list of questions. The questions do not resemble those cognitive grounded ones as found in Dr. Phil’s book, instead they appear to me, as aimed at pushing your buttons intuitively. A truly remarkable accomplishment, one that would be useful for many like myself. However this was as far as I went.

Hubbard, replaces the unconscious as a mind affecting force with ‘engrams’ which are formed when an individual is in an unconscious state or condition. Differently, Dr. Phil argues for finding for yourself an authentic self. That also sounds good to me, however he hardly mentions the unconscious at all and asks you review all that formed you over time, by use of his cris crossing inventories.

I did mention I had aberrations, did I not? The first interference of going further was the awareness that to really understand my position on the Hubbard Chart, I would have to attend introductory Scientology Church lectures. The second interference was that to trace back to source my quirks, distortions, aberrations scientifically and effectively I would have to undergo a Dianetic audit with a certified Dianetic auditor. Third interference is my concern of embracing a new religion as the end result. I have nothing against others going the total immersion route. For now, I am happy to borrow bits and pieces from L. Ron Hubbard’s book and Dr, Phil that are useful to me, for my self-analysis without becoming a convert to anything. Am I totally aberrant in taking this position?

I believe there are many ways to self-analyze, some methods may for one person and not for another.

IS THERE ANY GOOD EXCUSE NOT TO TRY?
Good Luck to any who would self-analyze!

–Dreameryv2

March 9, 2009

Why I Started My Self-Analysis. The maybe irrational reasons I started it.

Avatar for Dreameryv2

This is my Avartar, my user name is “Dreameryv2″ at Fateanalysis.com. I am taking this opportunity to tell you about where I am coming from as I take on the mind adventure of self-analysis.

WHY I Started My Self-Analysis. The maybe irrational reasons I started it.
The ideas I had formed over the years, mainly from movie versions of psychotherapists. Dramatically distorted to make some story work. I had come to see one one hand a fictional image of receiving hopeful understanding, forgiveness and painless repair. And on the other hand, there were images of crafty blackmailers, Svengali’s who took your very soul and used it for their own perverse desires. I had fears of things being dug from my lost memories such as mind-boggling sexual fantasies, traces of avarice and hatred, from when I did not get my way as a child. Also I, being for the most part a textbook example of normal-in my own opinion), feared being laughed at for even presenting myself for any sort of counseling or therapy. (I still feel this embarrassment at times.) I had over recent years read some introductory psychology books, including Dr. Phil McGraw’s book “SELF MATTERS”, Subtitled: ‘Creating Your Life from the Inside out –’ I really liked his book. I did his exercise and filled out the inventories that help you profile yourself. These were I felt advanced me in the direction I wanted to go. It was for me a very positive and valuable assistance, at the time. Later, still not totally satisfied, I came to believe his approach, so strictly cognitive and brief, omitted what it was I was yearning to explore in my self. The unconscious that my movie therapists were often referring to. The unconscious of Freud and Jung. Where dreams, fantasies, complexes, repression’s and aberrations are taken seriously. I am a prolific dreamer, I dream every night, I fantasize often, I have a over strong bond to my family, my aberrations are minor, but aberrations nevertheless. After some indecision’s and an internet search, I stumbled upon FateAnalysis.com where to my surprise, not only was the unconscious the regular focus, but how and why to self-analyze was developed with every new post and on the Blogroll there were links and pages, to other subject related Blogs, even free e-books. This content, and the security of being my very own analyst, made me feel at home on this site and I decided to do it. How to proceed?. I chose to approximate a classical Freudian psychoanalysis, couch, dreams and regular sessions. (You don’t have to go that far, maybe it’s my fantasy thing.) I felt, I could benefit from this more traditional psychoanalytic approach. This was not exactly a rational choice of course, I had seen and responded to this approach in several movies that I had seen. I recall, that at that time of seeing these movies, I had felt some envy and attraction to the thought of being psychoanalyzed by a male analyst. After seeing every episode of “The Sopranos”, I then begain to think maybe a female analyst would be better for me. Also I could not justify the expence and time costs of seeing a therapist professional. I had the feeling I would be laughed at, if the only reason I wanted to be analysed was- I wanted to explore me, as concieved in some old movies.

What the hell. I concluded. Let me try depth level self-analysis.

March 6, 2009

The battle between Freudian psychoanalysis and Jungian complex psychology has not yet ended

Filed under: Theory, Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — ?> @ 9:29 pm
It is as if, there are three pools of the unconscious –Most mental therapy systems fail because they do not reach and reset all three.
Szondi Psychology is gene ancestor based, but goes well beyond.
One needs to note that in the Americas the battle is mainly one of the cognitive schools against those schools than embrace and emphasize the unconscious as being the main determinate in mental life, symptoms and maladjustment. It is no longer fashionable to add quotes from Freud or Jung, much less the idiosyncratic, Prof. Szondi.

Powered by WordPress